The author is professor of biology, University of California, Santa Barbara. This article is based on a presidential address presented before the meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science at Utah State University, Logan, 25 June At the end of a thoughtful article on the future of nuclear war, Wiesner and York 1 concluded that:
Scharlach from Habitable Worlds objects to my point 3. I mention welfare, strikes agitating greater rights for the poor, multiculturalism, religious syncretism, sexual libertinism, and utopianism.
But the crux of his objection is more philosophical: But the question is: We should remember that when looking back at history, curious similarities arise, but they do so at incongruous joints, and their existence may not signify anything but the fact that Factory farming essay ideas political ecologies have limited practical expressions.
Think of it this way: A society whose political discourse and ideals sanction welfare to the poor because it is believed that the underclass is genetically inferior, incapable of taking care of itself, and might revolt if not given enough food. Contemporary progressive policies emerge from ideals and discourses about morality, justice, oppression, and rights.
The poor especially the dark-skinned poor deserve the welfare they get; it is theirs by Constitutional right. It is a moral and political imperative not to take away the welfare they receive and to give them more if possible. Progressives actively try to alleviate the shame once associated with receiving welfare.
Pointing out that the poor in America have it pretty good is a distinctly right-wing thing to do. Well, you can, but.
Welfare in America has become a right, a moral imperative, a matter of justice and just desserts, a thing that brings no shame, a thing to be proud of, a thing to demand, a thing to stand up for… So Scott Alexander is correct that social policies in ancient Rome look similar to contemporary progressive welfare policies.
But were the motives the same? Did the poor and the plebians get free or reduced-cost corn, grain, wine, and olive oil. Nowhere have I been able to fine a discussion of the Roman congiarium in terms of rights or justice.
 See Dennis Lee's The Alternative, exhibit 1B. Ms. D eputy Attorney General sent Dennis the evidence that she needed to make the consumer protection charge stick. Dennis was marketing his heat pump under his Systems for Savings plan, where the customer only . That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism. It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized. Factory farming is the process of “employing abusive practices that maximize agribusiness profits at the expense of the environment, our communities, animal welfare, and even our health” (Factory Farming).
The dole was there because it made the emperor more popular and demonstrated the wealth of Rome to the people. When was the last time you heard welfare policies discussed in terms of worshipful gratitude, mercy, and thankfulness?
If that were the discourse surrounding welfare policy, America would be a very different country. It seems that Roman welfare and American welfare are as different from one another as Jubilee is from abolitionism. I will agree that the Romans used different philosophical justifications for their welfare state than do moderns, but before discussing this, a lengthy and kind of pointless also-not-a-classicist digression on why the difference may not be as big as Scharlach suggests.
If the essay is trying to compare the grateful Roman poor and the entitled, demanding modern poor, I propose that the Roman recipients of the annona were as entitled and demanding as any modern. Ancient Roman leaders automatically assumed any hiccup in the flow of free grain would lead to riots, and their assumption was justified.
You may for example read the section on Roman food riots here. Or the essay may be trying to compare a Roman attitude of giving small strategic grants of welfare to the worthy with a modern attitude that everyone deserves as much welfare as they want at all times regardless of situation or else their human rights are violated.
But here, too, I do not think the distinction is as great as is claimed. People who want welfare benefits need to jump through various bureaucratic hoops some of which are actually kind of stupid and usually receive them only for a limited amount of time.
So much for our pointless digression. I assume Scharlach read my FAQ part 3.
Their social change would be a coincidence, unrelated to ours since it missed the crucial middle step that determined the shape our social change would take. A 25th century historian, looking back at our own age, might notice two things.
She would notice that suddenly, around the end of the 20th century, everyone started getting very fat. She might conclude, very rationally, that some people started a fat acceptance movement, it was successful, and so everyone became very fat.
With clearer knowledge of our era, we know better. We know that people started getting fat for, uh, reasons.From the era of slavery to the rise of Donald Trump, wealthy elites have relied on the loyalty of poor whites.
All Americans deserve better. I’m just a poor white trash motherfucker. The tools you need to write a quality essay or term paper; Saved Essays. You Have Not Saved Any Essays. The facts will paint a picture of exactly how gruesome factory farming can be.
Chickens are the most abused animals when it comes to factory farming methods. Poor farming factory practices have led to environmental issues 3/5(3). I have long called myself a social conservative.
I think it is very important to have standards for behaviour (etiquette) and defined roles. The problems with this system is not that it exists, but the lack of flexibility and the value placed on them. That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism.
It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized.
Factory farming means that farming is developed, and today, operations are strong and are able to produce food elevated in volume but factory workers don't think about the . Racism and discrimination are wrong as a matter of principle, not of science. That said, it is hard to see anything in the new understanding of race that gives ammunition to racists.